Databases

Database programs like SQLite3 and PostgreSQL have built-in strategies for handling locking to ensure data consistency and prevent race conditions when multiple transactions are accessing the same data concurrently. Here’s an overview of how each handles locking:

SQLite3

SQLite3 uses a combination of different locking mechanisms to manage concurrent access to the database:

Locking Modes:

Concurrency Control: WAL (Write-Ahead Logging): A mode that allows readers and writers to operate concurrently by writing changes to a separate log file before applying them to the main database file.

Example in SQLite3:

BEGIN TRANSACTION;
SELECT * FROM articles WHERE id = 1; -- Acquires a SHARED lock
UPDATE articles SET title = 'New Title' WHERE id = 1; -- Acquires an EXCLUSIVE lock
COMMIT;

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL uses a more sophisticated approach to handle locking and concurrency control:

Locking Levels:

MVCC (Multi-Version Concurrency Control): PostgreSQL uses MVCC to manage concurrent transactions. Each transaction sees a snapshot of the database at a particular point in time, allowing readers and writers to operate without blocking each other.

Deadlock Detection: PostgreSQL has built-in deadlock detection to identify and resolve deadlocks by aborting one of the conflicting transactions.

Example in PostgreSQL:

BEGIN;
SELECT * FROM articles WHERE id = 1 FOR UPDATE; -- Acquires a row-level lock
UPDATE articles SET title = 'New Title' WHERE id = 1;
COMMIT;

Summary

Both SQLite3 and PostgreSQL provide robust mechanisms for handling locking to ensure data consistency and prevent race conditions in concurrent environments.